Offshore wind power could provide far more electricity than the U.S. uses for residential, commercial and industrial purposes ...

Japan's industry and land ministers on Wednesday designated Matsumae and Hiyama, areas off the northern island of Hokkaido, ...

The Department of the Interior (DOI) announced on Tuesday that it is ending “preferential treatment” for what it calls ...

A move away from clean energy in Washington and Raleigh could make it more difficult for N.C.'s large, expensive offshore ...

Nippon Steel signed a cooperation memorandum with Denmark's wind turbine maker Vestas Wind Systems on Wednesday to supply ...

Energy Digital has ranked some of the largest companies in the world that manufacture leading innovations by installed ...

New York State’s Public Service Commission is withdrawing plans for a transmission line supporting offshore wind. The line ...

US President Donald Trump renewed his criticism of wind energy during a visit to Scotland, calling turbines ugly, costly, and ...

Earnings calls Wednesday revealed how the biggest wind and solar companies are confronting the president’s hostility toward ...

I applaud the opinion piece by Julia Pendleton, “Wind is free. So why kill offshore wind projects?” in the March 4 edition. Ms. Pendleton’s question is well taken.

It’s been three years since onshore works commenced for ScottishPower Renewables’ (SPR) East Anglia THREE offshore wind farm, which will power the equivalent of 1.3 million UK homes with clean and ...

By utilizing the power of offshore wind, Connecticut can become a leader in renewable energy, creating economic growth, ensuring energy security, and achieving its climate goals.